The
first time I read “Howl” I had no idea what was going on. But having to sit
down and actually work through a passage to create a thesis was actually very
helpful and enlightening. The pictures of the graphic novel helped as well, not
all were a perfect representation as Professor Lennon pointed out, but it
allowed me to view the poem as a poem of people and movement, not just words. “Howl”
is a poem of challenging society norms as well as pushing the boundary of
people’s thinking. The first passage I analyzed
was on page 61 and started with “who bit detectives.” The first thing I did was
look up the word pederasty, since I did not know it. The definition was of
someone who has anal intercourse with people especially young boys. This term made more sense after I analyzed the
first part of my passage. Ginsberg portrays the police force as intrusive and
suspicious. It is not just the police that are investigating the people, but
detectives. The use of the word detective gives the passage more weight. The
idea of biting the detectives in the neck hints at the action of taking the
police down where they are most vulnerable or at least tried to. The second
line of the passage discusses how the people being arrested participated in no
crime but doing something that may not be deemed normal by society such as
pederasty or intoxication of any nature. The passage as a whole gave a sense of
Ginsberg or the people who he surrounded himself with being persecuted by
society for their beliefs. As someone mentioned in class on Wednesday, Ginsberg’s
choice of words adds a criminalizing agent to the idea of homosexuality. Ginsberg
through this passage highlights the persecution he felt by society simply for
believing and doing the things he did.
My
second passage is on page 107 and discusses the idea of conformity. The first
thing that I noticed when I read this passage was the first few words “who
drove crosscountry.” This idea of driving across the continent was reminiscent of
Jack Kerouac’s On The Road. Since
Ginsberg and Kerouac were friends, a crossover of ideas was not too surprising.
With Kerouac, the idea of going across the continent to obtain “it” was
something that he was compelled to do. But for Ginsberg I think he is trying to
get across the idea that this chasing after enlightenment might be something
that is not all that unique. To support this idea of conformed enlightenment,
Ginsberg goes on to say “if I had a vision or you had a vision or he had a
vision to find eternity.” This phrasing suggests that the search for
enlightenment is not unique to any one person. Ginsberg spent most of “Howl”
trying to tell his message of the downfalls of society and through this simple
phrasing he illuminates how even a spiritual interaction may not be as singular
as once thought. On other major thing that I found in the passage is the reference
to driving precisely seventy two hours crosscountry. I found that adding this
number to a passage about prophets and finding eternity was purposeful. Seventy
two hours is exactly three days which is the time it took for Christ to come
back from the dead as the prophet of God. This time reference is used to reinforce
the idea of the prophet who brings the word, even if he is Christ himself,
possibly being anyone else.