Just like the differences in their
writing, the two videos show those differences in the styles and ideas
portrayed in the videos. Firstly, the subject of religion and faith is brought
up in both video clips. For the man in Burroughs’ film, God and faith is the
path to the “immaculate fix” and a holy experience. But for the group of
thinkers in Kerouac’s film, faith leaves them and the bishop denies any
recognition of their ideas. Burroughs’ film is structured almost as a Christmas
story from back in the day, similar to “It’s a Wonderful Life.” With Christmas music playing in the
background, it is implied that the Junky has learned a moral lesson by the
uplifting music in the background. This affirmation of God that is presented in
Burroughs’ film is reinforced with the strong religious language such as
inserting Christ throughout the piece. With Kerouac’s film, Milo’s friends
gather around the bishop, a symbol of God, and beg him to tell them if
everything is holy. The Bishop skips around the subject never giving a
definitive answer, and then finally excusing himself and his mother. While Milo and his friends look for
affirmation of faith from the man who is closest to God, the Junky finds
affirmation from being truly selfless. The Junky’s tale being seen as one of
personal spiritual transformation is also seen in the structure of the film. With
the older gentlemen reading from the book, the clay figures, and then the final
shot of the family celebrating Christmas together leads the audience to feel
the moral heaviness of the piece. While in Kerouac’s film, it is simply people
gathering in a room to discuss the holiness of their world. Even though the men
in Kerouac’s film are more socially mobile than the junky in Burroughs’ piece,
the Junky seems to have the spirituality and faith that Kerouac’s characters
are after.
Burroughs’
writing style is more upfront and explanatory while Kerouac tries
unconventional methods to get his point across. The bluntness exhibited by
Burroughs lends itself more to a moral tale than Kerouac’s since it reads with
more fluidity. The original story by Burroughs’ for me was a tale of a man
finding a more morally correct path in life. For Kerouac, I felt that he was
simply writing to try to convey an idea.
I also
saw an interesting interaction when Milo’s child was being walked to school by
his mother. The child asks his mother if he actually needs to go to school and
the mother responds with all the subjects the child does need to go to school
for. This interaction between mother and son seemed to suggest the influence of
social forces on the members of society. The mother adds “ology” to every
subject, showing her separation from society’s vein of thinking. The son shows
his rebellion against society when he awakes late at night and starts to play
his trumpet with his father. This interaction is critical in order to show the
audience how ideas were passed down.
Just as
Professor Lennon mentioned in class, Bill Burroughs is an extreme of the Beat
generation. This extreme can be seen in
his approach to the ideas presented by the Beat generation and the difference
in how Kerouac presents these same ideals.
No comments:
Post a Comment